Skip to main content

The Uvarov Review

ym8 — “your mate”, London text-speak  ·  A late edition  ·  Founded MMXXVI in London  ·  Vol. III, No. VIII

Section E · Commissions

Advisory commissions from Vasiliy Uvarov: production rebuilds, retained AI architecture support, and fixed-scope AI estate audits for regulated fintech.

Twenty Years of Replacing Processes That Stopped Working.

Not an AI practice. A longer habit that AI happens to be the current instrument for — taking a process a business has outgrown, and replacing it with one that runs.

The Record

The Ledger.

Seven processes, dated, with what replaced them and what can be produced if the claim is challenged.

A dated ledger of processes replaced between 2018 and 2026, with the state before, the state after, the context, and the supporting evidence for each.
2026

A 78-node visual automation nobody could test or debug

A tested service with tracing and PII scrubbing at the boundary

UK EMI · agent platform

Evidence: 170 tests green · OpenTelemetry spans · redaction at ingress

2026

135 repositories no one could hold in their head at once

One coordination layer: every route and service catalogued

UK EMI · engineering estate

Evidence: Whole-estate route and service inventory · 545 regulatory gaps catalogued across 12 domains

2024

Decisions taken from licensed BI dashboards and a spreadsheet

A self-serve BI layer inside a running OKR cycle, with owners on each metric

UK EMI · analytics and operating cadence

Evidence: Migration shipped; cadence still running two years on

2023

An onboarding funnel converting in the single digits, with a backlog behind it

Conversion roughly tripled and the backlog cut back by more than half

Independent product consultancy · client under NDA

Evidence: Funnel instrumented before and after; figures held under NDA

2023

B2B KYB taking ninety days per corporate

B2B KYB taking twelve, on document extraction

ECOMMPAY · payments

Evidence: Cycle-time measured on the same pipeline before and after

2022

Half the platform pinned to legacy dependencies

Modular KYC/AML, dependencies replaced

Moscow Exchange · market infrastructure

Evidence: £1.7M annual saving, signed off internally

2018

SME loan origination taking fourteen days, by hand

Origination under a day, with 100+ RPA bots behind it

Bank Otkritie · SME lending

Evidence: Book grew ₽70B → ₽130B over the programme

Client names are withheld where the work sits under NDA. Every row can be walked through in detail in a conversation, including the parts that did not go to plan.

A Built Capability

Governance knowledge, with the evidence attached.

A live technical capability that retrieves approval-gated, in-scope sources, returns cited evidence, and abstains when the corpus is silent.

Context
UK EMI · governance knowledge
Control receipt
Entity isolation · approval and supersession gates · evidence IDs · retrieval and citation evals
Claim boundary
Built and served as a retrieval capability; not presented as proof that the former evidence-assembly process has stopped, or as external production certification.

Occasionally Available

Three Commissions.

Occasionally taken alongside a full-time executive seat, when the fit is right. The first is the one worth having.

  1. [01]

    The Rebuild

    One process that has stopped working, replaced with something that runs in production and that your team can maintain after I stop.

    Shape
    A defined engagement against a named process, ending in a handover.
    Suited to
    A firm that already knows which process is broken and wants it replaced rather than described.
    You are left with
    Running code in your repositories, tests, traces, and a handover session — not a slide deck.
  2. [02]

    The Bench

    A standing seat for a team already building. Architecture review, escalation on hard calls, and a decision trail for the client owners who remain accountable.

    Shape
    Retained monthly, with a fixed number of days.
    Suited to
    A regulated firm whose engineers are moving fast enough that the governance question has become real.
    You are left with
    Written positions on the decisions taken, and an audit trail that survives a supervisory conversation.
  3. [03]

    The Audit

    A short, unsentimental read of an AI or automation estate: what is real, what is theatre, what will not survive a regulator asking about it.

    Shape
    Two to three weeks, fixed scope, fixed fee.
    Suited to
    A board or executive that has been told the AI programme is going well and would like that checked.
    You are left with
    A findings document ranked by exposure, and a sequenced plan you can execute without me.

The Small Print

Terms, Plainly.

Regulated experience is context, not an approval of this work. I am an FCA-approved EMD Individual, assessed against the Chief Product Officer seat, and now serve as Chief Data & AI Officer, UK EMIat the same firm. That status concerns management of the regulated firm. It is not an AI qualification, does not approve these commissions, and does not transfer a client’s legal or regulatory accountability to an external adviser.

A small number, alongside the day job.The executive seat comes first and is not negotiable; commissions are taken only where they do not compete with it. That is a real constraint on volume, and it is the reason the Rebuild is listed first — it is the work worth spending the constraint on.

No rates on this page. Scope decides the number, and scope is a conversation. What I will commit to before that conversation: a fixed fee against a fixed scope, and a written note of anything I think will not work before we start rather than after.

What you can check before writing. The skills and agents library is public under MIT (opens in a new tab), so the structure of how I build agents can be read without an NDA or a sales call.

Classifieds

Three Notices.

The orchestration library is public and MIT-licensed. No NDA, no call required. Inspect the repository (opens in a new tab)
What an AI governance leader in a regulated firm actually does day to day is a fifteen-minute conversation, not a pitch. Ask for the fifteen minutes
Name the process you want replaced. Write in

Enquiries

Writing In.

Name the process you want replaced. That is a more useful opening than a calendar invitation, and it is enough for me to say honestly whether this is worth either of our time.

Write to the Editor →